On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:39:46PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:05:32PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> Remove mach specific includes and use platform_data includes.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c | 3 +--
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c 
> >> b/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c
> >> index fed8b2e..04aced8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c
> >> @@ -28,12 +28,11 @@
> >>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> >>  
> >>  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> >> -#include <mach/hardware.h>
> >>  
> >>  #include <linux/usb.h>
> >>  #include <linux/usb/ch9.h>
> >>  #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
> >> -#include <mach/udc.h>
> >> +#include <linux/platform_data/pxa2xx_udc.h>
> >
> > this patch is fixing includes which were added in patch 1.
> Ah yes, you're correct. The includes breakage began at patch 1, I probably 
> have
> it from a missed rebase in my tree ...
> 
> Unfortunately for me it means a v5, with the includes fixed in patch 1 (the
> asm/byteorder.h looks very ugly and unwise too), and patch 4 discarded 
> (actually
> merged into patch 1 fixes).

right, it should be quick enough to do that with git rebase -i

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to