On 08/28/2014 11:33 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Mack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c
>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c
>> index 246a778..a5a27a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c
>> @@ -92,6 +92,15 @@ struct snd_uac2_chip {
>>
>> struct snd_card *card;
>> struct snd_pcm *pcm;
>> +
>> + /* timekeeping for the playback endpoint */
>> + unsigned int p_interval;
>> + unsigned int p_residue;
>> +
>> + /* pre-calculated values for playback iso completion */
>> + unsigned int p_pktsize;
>> + unsigned int p_pktsize_residue;
>> + unsigned int p_framesize;
>> };
>>
> I admire Alan's simple algo. I couldn't have matched that.
>
> However I am not sure how worth is the implementation if it requires 3
> more members to avoid calculations simple enough to cause no
> noticeable overhead. Once every millisecond is perfectly bearable IMO.
Alan is right. If we can avoid that, we should.
> 5 members in uac2 structure for only playback, look ugly.
It's still superior to a number of unnecessary calculations done every
millisecond which will come up with the same result every time. So I
clearly favor that approach. Three more ints in a struct don't hurt
really for something that's usually not instantiated more than once per
system.
Anyway, I'll leave it to Felipe whether to merge v5 or v6 :)
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
