On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:21:05PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > There is no need to have separate kthread for handling USB hub events. > It is more elegant to use the workqueue framework. > > The workqueue is allocated as unbound, cpu intensive, and freezable.
I'd just go with WQ_FREEZABLE. As a general rule of thumb, please only use attributes which are strictly necessary. If the default behavior turns out to be not so good for typical wq usages (and AFAICS khubd seems fairly typical), we should be changing the default behavior. Each usage deviating complicates the long-term prospect. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
