> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 4:34 AM
[...]
> >> > Looks like a candidate for ndo_gso_check(), so that we do not drop, but
> >> > instead segment from netif_needs_gso()/validate_xmit_skb()
> >> 
> >> You mean have the bridge implement the ndo_gso_check() method right?
> > 
> > No, I meant this particular driver.
> > 
> > Note that netif_skb_features() does only this check :
> > 
> > if (gso_segs > dev->gso_max_segs || gso_segs < dev->gso_min_segs)
> >       features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
> > 
> > Ie not testing gso_max_size
> > 
> > It looks like all these particular tests should be moved on
> > ndo_gso_check(), to remove code from netif_skb_features()
> 
> A check against gso_max_size is generic enough that it ought to be put
> right into netif_needs_gso() rather then duplicating it into every
> driver's ndo_gso_check() method don't you think?

Excuse me. I try to implement ndo_gso_check() with kernel 3.18.
However, I still get packets with gso and their skb lengths are more
than the acceptable one. Do I miss something?

+static bool rtl8152_gso_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
+{
+       if ((skb->len + sizeof(struct tx_desc)) > agg_buf_sz)
+               return false;
+
+       return true;
+}
 
@@ -5861,6 +5876,9 @@ static const struct net_device_ops rtl8152_netdev_ops = {
        .ndo_set_mac_address    = rtl8152_set_mac_address,
        .ndo_change_mtu         = rtl8152_change_mtu,
        .ndo_validate_addr      = eth_validate_addr,
+       .ndo_gso_check          = rtl8152_gso_check,
 };

Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to