On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:57 PM
> > To: Krzysztof Opasiak
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: composite: Provide list of
> > registered functions
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:00:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> > > @@ -1558,13 +1559,63 @@ void unregister_gadget_item(struct
> > config_item
> > > *item)  }  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_gadget_item);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> > 
> > why proc when I requested repeatedly to put this file under the
> > same configfs directory where functionfs is mounted ?
> > 
> 
> This patch has been sent before I got your suggestion to place it in
> sysfs.

not sysfs, configfs :-)

> I will hold-on with next versions of his patch till we agree where
> exactly
> it should be place. Please see my response[1] for some details.

replied.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to