On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 12:53 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 11:29 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > The usbfs API has a peculiar hole: Users are not allowed to reap their
> > > URBs after the device has been disconnected. There doesn't seem to be
> > > any good reason for this; it is an ad-hoc inconsistency.
> >
> > How many URBs can you queue this way?
>
> I don't understand the question. Are you asking how many URBs can be
> queued via usbfs? It's limited only by the restriction on the total
> memory usage (see usbfs_memory_mb in devio.c).
To be absolutely truthful, I am worried about resource leaks.
But I cannot really put my finger onto a concrete problem.
I see no bug with the patch.
Sorry
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
