Hi Roger, On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> wrote: >> time_ns_min = gpmc_ticks_to_ns(l ? l - 1 : 0); > > should be > time_ns_min = l ? gpmc_ticks_to_ns(l - 1) + 1 : 0; That's a micro-optimization. > > + 1ns since we don't want to fall into the previous tick > bracket. > for l == 0 we have t_min as 0. no need to pass it through > gpmc_ticks_to_ns() or add 1 ns. That's why the invervals are half-open. I can make them closed, no problem.
Regards, Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
