Lars Melin wrote:
> If these hints to "Joe" justifies a Suggested-by then he can add me,
> info is in this mails header.
>
> I do however not agree to the place where "Joe" has stuck it into the
> usb_device_id list, it should not be among
> the other Olivetti entries but further down among numeric value vid:pid
> entries.
>
> /Lars
Thank you Lars for your answer! :)
Here we have an other hint, I could shift down my Olicard entry before submit
the patch... no problem.
Here we are:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- linux/drivers/usb/serial/option.c.orig 2015-06-10 10:42:43.000000000
+0200
+++ linux/drivers/usb/serial/option.c 2015-06-10 10:53:06.825265579 +0200
@@ -1765,6 +1765,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(0x2001, 0x7d03, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00) },
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(0x07d1, 0x3e01, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) }, /*
D-Link DWM-152/C1 */
{ USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(0x07d1, 0x3e02, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff) }, /*
D-Link DWM-156/C1 */
+ { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2020, 0x4000, 0xff) }, /*
OLICARD300 - MT6225 */
{ USB_DEVICE(INOVIA_VENDOR_ID, INOVIA_SEW858) },
{ USB_DEVICE(VIATELECOM_VENDOR_ID, VIATELECOM_PRODUCT_CDS7) },
{ } /* Terminating entry */
-----------------------------------
What do you think about?
Could be a better placement?
Let me know,
thanks again! :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
