On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:23:39AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Peter Chen wrote:
> 
> > The bulk queue tests are used to show 'best performance' for bulk
> > transfer, we are often asked this question by users.
> > 
> > It's result should be very close to IC simulation, in order
> > to get that, the device side should also need to prepare enough
> > queue.
> > 
> > We have got the 'best performance' (IN: ~41MB, OUT: ~39MB) at i.mx platform
> > (USB2, ARM Cortex A9) with below command:
> > 
> > Host side:
> > modprobe usbtest
> > ./testusb -a -t 27 -g 64 -s 16384
> > ./testusb -a -t 28 -g 64 -s 16384
> > Gadget side:
> > modprobe g_zero loopdefault=1 qlen=64 buflen=16384
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > 
> > I am not sure if it is good to reuse iso structure, so I take
> > it as RFC. If reuse is accepted, I will rename the iso
> > structures to common one.
> > 
> >  drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 88 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > index ad6dd4a..f1faeb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >  static int override_alt = -1;
> >  module_param_named(alt, override_alt, int, 0644);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(alt, ">= 0 to override altsetting selection");
> > +static void iso_callback(struct urb *urb);
> >  
> >  
> > /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> >  
> > @@ -239,7 +240,8 @@ static struct urb *usbtest_alloc_urb(
> >     unsigned long           bytes,
> >     unsigned                transfer_flags,
> >     unsigned                offset,
> > -   u8                      bInterval)
> > +   u8                      bInterval,
> > +   bool                    queue_callback)
> 
> Should this be named "is_iso" instead?  It would be be more clear.
> 

ISO transfer uses different function iso_alloc_urb to allocate urb,
the reason we need one more parameter at usbtest_alloc_urb is we
use different callback for simple polling bulk transfer and
interrupt-triggered bulk transfer.

So, do you agree I reuse the iso structures to implement it? 

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to