On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:16:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> with these patches (and, no, the mass storage patch is not extremely important
> although it gives some nice extra improvement - about 1 MiB/sec extra in some
> cases - at least not for USB2, I tested without that as well), I increased 
> USB2
> on a AM437x board with g_mass_storage using RAM as backing store from 
> 17MiB/sec
> to 39MiB/sec as measured by dd (with oflag/iflag=direct depending on whether I
> was writing or reading from g_mass_storage).
> 
> I'm yet to test all other gadget drivers to make sure there are no
> regressions, but it's looking promissing.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Changes since V1:
>       - fix regression with isochronous transfers

found a regression with g_ether, I'll debug further tomorrow.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to