The 0.95 xHCI spec says that non-control endpoints will be halted if a
babble is detected on a transfer.  The 0.96 xHCI spec says all types of
endpoints will be halted when a babble is detected.  Some hardware that
claims to be 0.95 compliant halts the control endpoint anyway.

Reference: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg21755.html

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bha...@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 3915657..59841a9 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int xhci_requires_manual_halt_cleanup(struct 
xhci_hcd *xhci,
        if (trb_comp_code == COMP_TX_ERR ||
                        trb_comp_code == COMP_BABBLE ||
                        trb_comp_code == COMP_SPLIT_ERR)
-               /* The 0.96 spec says a babbling control endpoint
+               /* The 0.95 spec says a babbling control endpoint
                 * is not halted. The 0.96 spec says it is.  Some HW
                 * claims to be 0.95 compliant, but it halts the control
                 * endpoint anyway.  Check if a babble halted the
-- 
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to