Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote: > On 11/03/16 23:07, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: >> I’m also wondering whether it would be beneficial to get rid of buflen >> all together and use wMaxPacketSie for in endpoints as well? Is that >> feasible? > > Yes, we could just remove the buflen parameter. > > The only scenario where I can see buflen been "useful" is if the user > wants to have a smaller buffer size for the OUT endpoint. Should we > support this case or not?
Splitting data into multiple packets would not make sense from a performance perspective. The only possible reason would be to work around a (theoretical) bug in some host software that does not handle larger buffers, but there aren't that many host implementations, and I am not aware of any with such a bug. Regards, Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
