On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 10:53 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:

> Even more valuable when you make it device or bus specific.  I don't see
> Greg arguing against a knob to turn off LPM.  Only the slegde hammer
> operated master switch implementation :)

We do have nousb and autosuspend=-1
And it is easy to explain to users for debugging.

> I recently started thinking about ways to make it easier to test/debug
> all (or at least most of) the USB quirks. I stopped after discovering

Good idea.

> that I didn't need the new quirk I thought I needed after all..  But the
> idea was something along the lines of reusing the dynamic ID code in the
> quirk processing. The "usb" driver could have a "new_id" (but let's call
> it something else please) attribute, allowing writing a device ID and
> quirk flag.  Reading the attribute should give you a list of all current
> quirks.  The quirk processing is based on the common device matching
> code, so adding dynamic device id matching should be a piece of cake
> (FLW). 
> 
> Whatdoyouthink?  Yes, I know - too much talk and too little code.  I'll
> see if I can come up with an RFC patch if noone else does in the mean
> time.

Copy the code uas.c provides.

        Regards
                Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to