Hi, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:46:47PM +0000, David Fisher wrote: >> dwc3 is in dual-role, with "synopsys,dwc3" specified in DT. >> >> When xhci is probed, initiated from dwc3/host.c (not DT), we get : >> xhci-hcd: probe of xhci-hcd.7.auto failed with error -5 >> This -EIO error originated from inside dma_set_mask() down in >> include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h >> >> If "generic-xhci" is specified in DT instead, it probes fine as a host-only >> dwc3 >> The difference between DT initiated probe and dwc3 initiated probe is that >> when DT initiated probe gets to dma_supported, dma_supported is >> implemented by swiotlb_dma_supported (previously set up by a DT call to >> arch_dma_setup_ops). >> Whereas when dwc3 initiated xhci probe gets to dma_supported, >> arch_dma_setup_ops has not been called >> and dma_supported is only implemented by __dummy_dma_supported, returning 0. >> >> Bisecting finds the "bad" commit as >> 1dccb598df549d892b6450c261da54cdd7af44b4 (inbetween 4.4-rc1 and 4.4-rc2) >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >> >> Previous to this commit, dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops was done in >> arm64_dma_init >> After this commit, the assignment is only done in arch_dma_setup_ops. > > This restriction was added on purpose and the arm64 __generic_dma_ops() > now has a comment: > > /* > * We expect no ISA devices, and all other DMA masters are expected to > * have someone call arch_setup_dma_ops at device creation time. > */ >
how ? > The commit above also describes why it is dangerous to assume a fallback > to swiotlb ops. > >> We're not using any dwc3-<glue>.c wrapper here, but we've not needed >> it before this commit. Relevant ? >> >> It might also be possible that we've messed up some KConfig that >> changed between versions ? Or is this a bug that needs patching - in >> arm(64) dma or something different for dma setup in dwc3/host.c ? > > What I don't understand is why of_dma_configure() is not called for a > device with compatible="synopsys,dwc3" in DT (IIUC, you said that you > specify this in DT and of_platform_populate should do the right > configuration). it works fine for dwc3 core, but dwc3 manually creates a device for the XHCI core it has inside it. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
