On 06/12/2016 06:05 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > Okay, thanks. I just wanted to be sure the patch was behaving as > intended. It was, but since it didn't fix your problem the whole > thing's a moot point.
Anything else you'd like me to try or gather if you're interested in fixing the underlying problem? (Even though I now have a workable workaround for my problem.) Sincerely, Sean M. Pappalardo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
