On 21 June 2016 at 20:27, Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Baolin Wang <[email protected]> writes: >>> Baolin Wang <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> Can't you just tie a charger to a UDC and avoid the charger class >>>>> completely? >>>> >>>> Yeah, I also hope so. But we really want something to manage the >>>> charger devices, do you have any good suggestion to avoid the 'class' >>>> but also can manage the charger devices? >>> >>> manage in what way? It seems to me that they don't need to be real >>> devices, just a handle as part of struct usb_gadget, no? >> >> Although charger device is not one real hardware device, we also use >> one 'struct device' to describe it in charger.c file. So we should >> manage the 'struct device' with one proper way. > > that's fine, but why do you think they need a struct device to start with?
We can get/put usb charger and mange usb charger attributes with the device model if we use a struct device. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
