On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the > corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c > index 66efa9a..7ad395e 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/fotg210-hcd.c > @@ -4789,7 +4789,7 @@ out_unlock: > return ret; > } > > -static DEVICE_ATTR(uframe_periodic_max, 0644, show_uframe_periodic_max, > +static DEVICE_ATTR(uframe_periodic_max, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | > S_IROTH, show_uframe_periodic_max, Over 80 chars. julia > store_uframe_periodic_max); > > static inline int create_sysfs_files(struct fotg210_hcd *fotg210) > -- > 2.9.2 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
