Hi,
Felipe Ferreri Tonello <e...@felipetonello.com> writes:
>> Felipe Ferreri Tonello <e...@felipetonello.com> writes:
>>>> "Felipe F. Tonello" <e...@felipetonello.com> writes:
>>>>> The default_length parameter of alloc_ep_req was not really necessary
>>>>> and gadget drivers would almost always create an inline function to pass
>>>>> the same value to len and default_len.
>>>>>
>>>>> So this patch also removes duplicate code from few drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Felipe F. Tonello <e...@felipetonello.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c | 10 ++--------
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c | 9 +--------
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_midi.c | 10 ++--------
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_sourcesink.c | 11 ++---------
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/u_f.c | 7 +++----
>>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/u_f.h | 3 +--
>>>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>>>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>>>> index 51980c50546d..e82a7468252e 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_hid.c
>>>>> @@ -362,12 +362,6 @@ static int f_hidg_open(struct inode *inode, struct
>>>>> file *fd)
>>>>>
>>>>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>>>> /* usb_function
>>>>> */
>>>>>
>>>>> -static inline struct usb_request *hidg_alloc_ep_req(struct usb_ep *ep,
>>>>> - unsigned length)
>>>>> -{
>>>>> - return alloc_ep_req(ep, length, length);
>>>>> -}
>>>>
>>>> actually, I prefer to keep these little helpers. I was recently playing
>>>> with adding SG list support to g_zero (I should have patches soon) and
>>>> it was actually very nice to have the sourcesink helper as I could just
>>>> ditch alloc_ep_req(). The change to the driver was local to
>>>> ss_alloc_ep_req() and nothing else changed :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, but then it is worth to have the helper function. In this
>>> particular case, I am removing a useless helper functions, especially
>>> that the previous patch removes the need for the optional parameter in
>>> alloc_ep_req.
>>
>> it's a static inline :-) It won't do any bad to keep it. And, as I said,
>> if we want to ditch aloc_ep_req() eventually, then we have just one
>> place to patch ;-)
>
> Yes, sure. But why drop alloc_ep_req()?because we can't find a generic way of allocating sglist with enough entries :-) Some drivers (like f_fs.c) could actually have zero-copy sglist by just pinning user pages with get_user_pages_fast() and following with sg_alloc_from_pages(). g_zero, however, would just "emulate" sglist by just allocating a statically sized sg table and initializing chunks of the linear req->buf to each sg entry. > So should I keep all these helper functions? If so, I actually still > need to fix them to use the newer alloc_ep_req() API. yeah, keeping the helper functions would be nice. IMHO, alloc_ep_req() doesn't have a long life, but it's pretty good for the time being. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
