On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:59:51AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:05:49PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:01:53AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit > > > > 18266403f3fe507f0246faa1d5432333a2f139ca: > > > > > > > > USB: cdc-acm: fix TIOCMIWAIT (2016-11-10 13:12:59 +0100) > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peter.chen/usb.git/ > > > > tags/usb-ci-v4.9-rc6 > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 62ee9585fed19e4de9c3941b9c74044205ae13bd: > > > > > > > > usb: chipidea: move the lock initialization to core file (2016-11-14 > > > > 09:42:25 +0800) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > One patch to fix kernel dump for non-initialized lock > > > > > > Is this a regression, or fixing something new? Can you just post the > > > one patch? That's easier than a git pull request... > > > > > > > It is a new fix. Patch v2 has sent. > > Oh, I didn't realize that was the fix you were trying to send. Please > be more explicit. > > > What's criterion for sending patch and pull request? The number of Patch? > > How > > many? > > Given that I found a problem with your first version, maybe we should > switch back to patches? There is no hard-and-fast rule as to which is > better here, I can handle either just as well, with patches usually > working quicker than pull requests as they fit into my workflow easier. >
I see, thanks. Please omit this git pull request -- Best Regards, Peter Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
