* Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +static void xdbc_runtime_delay(unsigned long count)
> >> +{
> >> + udelay(count);
> >> +}
> >> +static void (*xdbc_delay)(unsigned long) = xdbc_early_delay;
> > Is this udelay() complication really necessary? udelay() should work fine
> > even in
> > early code. It might not be precisely calibrated, but should be good enough.
>
> I tried udelay() in the early code. It's not precise enough for the
> hardware handshaking.
Possibly because on x86 early udelay() did not work at all - i.e. there's no
delay
whatsoever.
Could you try it on top of this commit in tip:timers/core:
4c45c5167c95 x86/timer: Make delay() work during early bootup
?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
