On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:04:24 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 07:24:37PM +0300, Maksim Salau wrote:
> > Allocate buffers on HEAP instead of STACK for local structures
> > that are to be received using usb_control_msg().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maksim Salau <maksim.sa...@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Alfredo Rafael Vicente Boix <alvi...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org  
> 
> This patch does not apply to usb-next, what did you make it against?
> 
> Can you rebase it and resend?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I've created the patch against linux-stable v4.10.12. I've checked history 
of the driver and it turns out that the patch conflicts with 
9b181166f17534a82b4b628b13e524a893715dfc

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/drivers/usb/misc/legousbtower.c?h=usb-next&id=9b181166f17534a82b4b628b13e524a893715dfc

There are no conflicting changes, but context has changed.
I'll rebase and resend shortly.

The same patch can't be used for stable and for usb-next anymore. Is there
any chance to backport the fix for stable?

Regards,
Maksim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to