Am Dienstag, den 16.05.2017, 21:17 -0500 schrieb Alberto Ladron:
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Ladron <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c | 83 
> ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c 
> b/drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c
> index 3b0294e..9eddc40 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c
> @@ -152,13 +152,13 @@ struct usbat_info {
>       unsigned long sense_ascq;  /* additional sense code qualifier */
>  };
>  
> -#define short_pack(LSB,MSB) ( ((u16)(LSB)) | ( ((u16)(MSB))<<8 ) )
> +#define short_pack(LSB, MSB) (((u16)(LSB)) | (((u16)(MSB))<<8))
>  #define LSB_of(s) ((s)&0xFF)
>  #define MSB_of(s) ((s)>>8)
>  
> -static int transferred = 0;
> +static int transferred;
>  
> -static int usbat_flash_transport(struct scsi_cmnd * srb, struct us_data *us);
> +static int usbat_flash_transport(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct us_data *us);
>  static int usbat_hp8200e_transport(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct us_data 
> *us);
>  
>  static int init_usbat_cd(struct us_data *us);
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int init_usbat_flash(struct us_data *us);
>                   vendorName, productName, useProtocol, useTransport, \
>                   initFunction, flags) \
>  { USB_DEVICE_VER(id_vendor, id_product, bcdDeviceMin, bcdDeviceMax), \
> -  .driver_info = (flags) }
> +.driver_info = (flags) }
>  
>  static struct usb_device_id usbat_usb_ids[] = {
>  #    include "unusual_usbat.h"
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void usbat_pack_ata_sector_cmd(unsigned char *buf,
>   */
>  static int usbat_get_device_type(struct us_data *us)
>  {
> -     return ((struct usbat_info*)us->extra)->devicetype;
> +     return ((struct usbat_info *)us->extra)->devicetype;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int usbat_write(struct us_data *us,
>   * Convenience function to perform a bulk read
>   */
>  static int usbat_bulk_read(struct us_data *us,
> -                        void* buf,
> +                        void *buf,
>                          unsigned int len,
>                          int use_sg)
>  {
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int usbat_bulk_read(struct us_data *us,
>   * Convenience function to perform a bulk write
>   */
>  static int usbat_bulk_write(struct us_data *us,
> -                         void* buf,
> +                         void *buf,
>                           unsigned int len,
>                           int use_sg)
>  {
> @@ -416,11 +416,11 @@ static int usbat_wait_not_busy(struct us_data *us, int 
> minutes)
>        * minutes!
>        */
>  
> -     for (i=0; i<1200+minutes*60; i++) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < 1200+minutes*60; i++) {
>  
> -             result = usbat_get_status(us, status);
> +             result = usbat_get_status(us, status);
>  
> -             if (result!=USB_STOR_XFER_GOOD)
> +             if (result != USB_STOR_XFER_GOOD)
>                       return USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ERROR;
>               if (*status & 0x01) { /* check condition */
>                       result = usbat_read(us, USBAT_ATA, 0x10, status);
> @@ -429,16 +429,16 @@ static int usbat_wait_not_busy(struct us_data *us, int 
> minutes)
>               if (*status & 0x20) /* device fault */
>                       return USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_FAILED;
>  
> -             if ((*status & 0x80)==0x00) { /* not busy */
> +             if ((*status & 0x80) == 0x00) { /* not busy */

Would you care to make a second pass and submit patches using the BIT()
macro where appropriate?

> [..]
> @@ -1753,13 +1752,13 @@ static int usbat_flash_transport(struct scsi_cmnd * 
> srb, struct us_data *us)
>                * I don't think we'll ever see a READ_12 but support it anyway
>                */
>               block = ((u32)(srb->cmnd[2]) << 24) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[3]) << 
> 16) |
> -                     ((u32)(srb->cmnd[4]) <<  8) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[5]));
> +                     ((u32)(srb->cmnd[4]) <<  8) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[5]));
>  
>               blocks = ((u32)(srb->cmnd[6]) << 24) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[7]) << 
> 16) |
> -                      ((u32)(srb->cmnd[8]) <<  8) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[9]));
> +                     ((u32)(srb->cmnd[8]) <<  8) | ((u32)(srb->cmnd[9]));

There is no point in beautifying such things. Just make another pass
and use the macros for endianness conversion with unaligned access.

        Regards
                Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to