<snip> > So, in order to have both a GPL and a non-GPL version of the code, > you split the tree and maintain both separately. Ideally, > changes would > be made to the commercial version and then transferred into the > GPL (rather than the other way 'round).
I read into what you are saying that the commercial version of the software is non-gpl. My understanding of GPL is that it doesn't prohibit you making a charge for the software. Commercial software can be GPL.
