On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:02:41AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Theres a balance between super supreme mega amazing security and > real world usability, a box that runs like you describe would need > downtime to reconfigure, thats just not acceptable IMHO.
not true, another security measure would be to run the system of a cdrom (have it send logs to another machine) then reconfiguring would mean writing a new cd image, whcih means you would do it from another machine, then throw in the new cd into your "secure" machine reboot and off you go, minimal downtime. greetings, martin. -- i am looking for a job anywhere in the world, doing pike programming, caudium/pike/roxen training, roxen/caudium and/or unix system administration. -- pike programmer Traveling in Singapore (www|db).hb2.tuwien.ac.at unix (iaeste|bahai).or.at (www.archlab|iaeste).tuwien.ac.at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org mud.at is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin B"ahr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
