Jeremy Bertenshaw wrote: > By 'unable to fulfil each others dependencies' i'm saying that rpm was unable to >figure out from the list of rpms given to it (*) that they will cover all the >dependencies, as a side thought, surely this has to be a non-trivial programming >issue as the size of the list of rpm's increases.
While I wouldn't call it trivial, it certainly is not a very difficult programming problem, if you know the right approach to use. Do a degree in Computer Science, we'll show you how to do it :-) Cheers, -- Carl Cerecke, Assistant Lecturer|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Computer Science, |Phone: +64 3 364 2987 ext. 7859 University of Canterbury, |Fax: +64 3 364 2569 Private Bag 4800, |http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~cdc Christchurch, New Zealand. |
