Users beginning to consider StarOffice
http://www.idg.net.nz/webhome.nsf/NL/B2DE6810C5A94642CC256BB1000F6047


Patrick Thibodeau, SAN DIEGO
End-user unrest over Microsoft's enterprise licensing plan may prompt 
some companies to move from the Microsoft Office suite to rival Sun 
Microsystems' personal productivity suite, StarOffice, according to 
Gartner.

Stamford, Connecticut-based Gartner estimates that StarOffice has a 
better-than-even chance of taking 10% of the office productivity suite 
market at Microsoft's expense by the end of 2004.

Michael Silver, a Gartner analyst, says some firms are beginning to 
weigh the cost and licensing terms of Microsoft's Office against 
StarOffice's improving compatibility with Microsoft file formats and its 
expected lower pricing.

Sun intends to begin charging for StarOffice when Version 6.0 is 
released by the end of next month, but it will couple that with support 
services. Pricing hasn't been announced, but a Sun official says 
Gartner's estimate of $US25 to $US 75 per user, depending on volume, is 
in the ballpark. The move is a strategic one for Sun, which had 
previously made StarOffice available for free but with minimal support.

Microsoft declines to disclose its enterprise volume licence pricing.

"StarOffice has a chance, based on [improved] compatibility, some mind 
share and Microsoft missteps," says Silver. But concerns about migration 
costs, end-user training and converting documents could deter companies, 
he says.

Gartner's prediction of a potential 10% market share for StarOffice may 
seem small, but it's likely the boldest prediction to date of a product 
with the potential to dent Microsoft's desktop market share. Still, the 
hurdles for reaching that market could be high.

David Morris, a senior vice president of e-business solutions at 
AmeriCredit in Fort Worth, Texas, is among those who have downloaded 
StarOffice for a tryout. He called it "a pretty good product" but says 
he's not about to roll it out to his 6000 users.

The training and infrastructure costs associated with moving end users 
to a new productivity suite pose too big a barrier, says Morris. "We 
don't think there are viable alternatives [to Office]," he says.

But another end user attending the Gartner Symposium/ITxpo disagreed. 
Mike Thiele, associate director of corporate IT infrastructure at Gilead 
Sciences, a biopharmaceutical firm in Foster City, California, said his 
company is looking at alternatives to Office, partly because it doesn't 
want to rely on one vendor.

StarOffice has about 10 million users worldwide. Its largest enterprise 
user is Sun, at 39,000 seats, followed by the US Department of Defence, 
with 15,000 users, according to Tony Siress, a senior director of 
marketing at Sun. The change to a pricing model is intended to let users 
know that StarOffice is "a committed, sustainable offering," he said.

Microsoft's new enterprise licensing plan, announced last year, drew 
complaints from many firms, which said it would raise their costs.

Gordon Pope, manager of network computing at the British Columbia Hydro 
and Power Authority in Vancouver, says those licensing changes have 
raised concerns. "Would I look to find alternatives to Microsoft? 
Absolutely," says Pope. "The concern that we have is [that] the 
weirdness of the licensing is costing us a lot of money every couple of 
years."

Reply via email to