Just wait, see:-

http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.cfm?DocumentID=14030

Chris Bayley wrote:
> IHug Ultra Satellite should be available pretty much anywhere, if you're 
> game to play with Ihug, (worth it if it's the only option)
> Chris
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Adam Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]*On Behalf Of *Adam Martin
>     *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2002 23:44
>     *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     *Subject:* High Speed Internet in....
> 
>     ...."remote locations", isn't funny what some people class as remote
>     locations, looking at getting high speed internet access (of any
>     description) in Hanmer Springs, I was surprised to find that there
>     are no options at all.
>     ADSL?   --- Not supported
>     Frame Relay, which is advertised as available in most areas  -- Not
>     available
>      
>     Does anybody have any ideas of what I can do, I find it amazing that
>     a town like Hanmer has not had their  exchange upgraded at all. A
>     township that has over 30 motels/hotels alone... must be a candidate
>     for a tech boost. the best connection I have got while up there is
>     33k    --- luckily I live in chch, parents in Hanmer.
>      
>     Anyhow, I welcome any suggestions... apparently there is a wireless
>     option, Telecom are getting back to me, but I suspect that that will
>     be utilising the 027 (CDMA) network, which as well as being ultra
>     expensive, considering I want 24hr connections - I don't trust
>     either being a current 027 customer who has had not too much joy
>     with the system.
>      
>     Strangely enough, Ihug claims that I can get Frame Relay with them
>     (is this an indication about the knowledge of their 'Tech Support'),
>     the cost for Ihug 128k Frame Relay   --- only $1100 per month, $500
>     setup fee, and router $1600.
>      
>     As a side point, what do Cash machines run on? ATM? I guess that may
>     be another solution, I am sure that will come at a cost as well.
>      
>     .... enough said
>     Adam
> 



Reply via email to