On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 01:10, Philip Charles wrote: > I took a look at the change-log (as far as my Anglo Saxon would let me) > and took a punt. I would say 08-11-2002 would be OK (change log again), > but be careful of its size.
That's the one I've been using. Other than its version of parted being a bit outdated, it works just fine. I've got the 12-Dec downloading and I'll probably burn it on Monday. Vik :v)
