As Gareth says it depends why you are using it. If its a quick and dirty copy in a hurry now, use whats setup now!
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:27:29 +1200 C Falconer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:13, Nick Rout wrote: > > ooops what I actually meant was "you can use mount -t smbfs for a SMB > > (not samba) share on a remote computer" - in other words a directory > > shared using the smb protocol, be it windows or unix based. > > > > And I agree, if it is strictly between unix hosts, smb is a waste of > > resources, the only advantage would be if you wanted windows users to > > share at the same time. > > More so - you can share the same directory on your linux server with NFS > and samba at the same time. > > Other linux hosts benefit from NFS speed, and windows users see the same > thing! > >
