It will never work from inside the network. You cannot test on a nat
setup without coming in from the outside.

On Tue, 05 Aug 2003
19:16:54+1200 Adam Martin<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It seems to be going, the main problem was that I was within the
> network when testing... ie it wasn't getting to smoothwall for it to
> be able to do the redirection.
> Testing from outside of the network (through the use of an anonymiser
> service) does indeed allow me to see both machines fine.
> However, the actual page I want to open by default is in a
> sub-directory of www, I am guessing the easiest way to rectify that is
> a quick edit of httpd.conf.

try a symlink



> 
> Thanks again for your help.
> Regards
> Adam
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Sawtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 7:13 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Smoothwall help...
> 
> On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:55, you wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > Again I turn to you all for some help.
> > I have finally got mysql behaving as it should over TCP/IP.
> >
> > Now I have a simple question ( I hope).,
> > I have several boxes on the network. 1 being a windows box serving a
> > clients site and the other in question being the newly installed
> debian
> > system.
> >
> > I want to be able to access a site I have setup on the debian box.
> > I have smoothwall to protect the network.
> >
> > So I thought by setting up port forwarding that I should be able to
> > achieve what I wanted.
> > However, it isn't working. could it be a caching problem or?
> Quite possibly.
> 
> > Below is the port redirections in question.
> >
> > Proto    External source IP         Source port       Destination IP
> > Destination port
> > TCP      ALL                              88
> > 192.168.0.25                 80
> > TCP      ALL                              80
> > 192.168.0.10                 80
> >
> >
> > The 2nd entry works fine, however the top entry does not.
> > Any ideas?
> What happens if you run the server on the 192.168.0.25 machine to
> accept
> 
> connections on port 88. i.e. no port number translation?
> I'd be interested to know if IPCop will do the port number translation
> where 
> Smoothwall seems to fail. I'll do some experiments.
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely etc.,
> Christopher Sawtell
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to