Interesting article here on patching:

http://www.csoonline.com/read/080103/patch.html

or did i get that link from this list anyway (sorry if i did, i think it
was NZLUG)


On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:59:15 +1200
"Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> With these latest security flaws being taken advantage of on MS products I
> thought I should audit some of our machines here at work.
> 
> It was laughable reading the MS blurb regarding NT Service Packs.
> 
> They went from SP1 through to SP6 then there was SP6a and they said there
> would probably be a SP7.
> Then they said there were fewer problems with the mature product so SP7
> would not be coming.
> 
> Now they have launched "NT4 Service pack 6a security rollup"
> 
> Is NT deprecated?
> 
> It has certainly depreciated.
> 
> Rob
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 August 2003 2:24 p.m.
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      "depreciated" deprecated
> 
> I hate to be pedantic, but I am, and not getting at anyone in particular,
> its a universal problem, the word is "deprecated" not "depreciated",and
> this sentence is too long and bad english.
> 
> 
> depreciation is an accounting term. you buy an asset, it depreciates and
> becomes worth less money, as in "I paid $250 for this windows 95 license
> and now I can only sell it for peanuts, thats depreciation for you"
> 
> deprecation is a term of disapproval, you invent a better method of
> command substitution and deprecate the old method (these words are often
> referred to in the context of a feature that will be removed at some
> point, as in "support by this manufacturer for microsoft operating
> systems is deprecated in favour of open source software, and support for
> microsoft may be removed entirely in future versions without warning"
> 

-- 
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to