I think SCO are well ovedue for the finger. And no, I can't see Linux as being the guilty party - closed source _does_ have a lot more hiding space, after all. It's far more likely that SCO is the infringing party:
"Is there Linux code in SCO's UnixWare?" http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/ Wesley Parish On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:18, you wrote: > Hi there, > > Jason wrote: > > Ok Nick, you wanted your reason for inititating legal action - here it > > is (I think): > > I think the answer for Linux is to remove the code, add a different code > that accomplishes the same thing, and give the big fat finger to SCO... > > Kind regards, > > Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch. -- Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?" You ask, "What is the most important thing?" Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata." I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."
