Hi Matthew, I understand that I don't actually need to remove the route. Not at the moment anyway. But not having the choice about whether the route is there or not smacks of products from another well-known OS company.
I can remove the route with the "route" command but I am baffled as to why it's there at all. Once again, it's attached to an interface that has a statically assigned IP. Michael. >===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===== >On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:30:04PM +1200, Michael wrote: > >> In an exciting chain of events the power into our building was cut and >> hence the box went to sleep. When it woke up the routes were still >> there, despite the additions I made to the ifcfg files. > >Why do you think you need to remove the 169.254/16 route? > >Cheers, >-mjg >-- >Matthew Gregan |/ > /| [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message generated in webmail.
