"PITA" - well spoken. And I thought it was just me when I started this thread.
Robert Never test the depth of the water with both feet. -----Original Message----- From: Zane Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 1:02 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Paradise spam + virus filtering] Mike Beattie wrote: > Because the list is setting a Reply-To: address, but it will not overwrite a > Reply-To header written by a subscribed user. So, when you hit 'reply' on a > mail, and it goes to the user, it's because they've explicitly set a > Reply-To header. > > Mike. I have also been bitten by this and it is damned irritating. I know that there are people who hold the "reply-to munging harmful" opinion strongly. But setting up their emails so that they are non-standard *on this list* is just a PITA :-P -- Zane Gilmore, Analyst / Programmer Information Services Section, Information Technology Dept, University of Canterbury - Te Whare Waananga o Waitaha Private Bag 4800, Christchurch New Zealand Phone +64-3-364 2987 extn 7895
