Thanks, but it turned out to be a conflict/misunderstanding between SpamAssassins settings and those in amavisd-new - which might be a fine product but has horrible config file...
- steve -----Original Message----- From: Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 5 September 2003 4:13 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SpamAssassin query... My guess if your using sa 2.5+ is thats the Bayesian filter rating some thing as very likely to be spam (95%+ maybe) but the rules not rating it as spam. Thats a total guess mind you. If it is spam try sa-learn --spam --file ***. Chad > I'm just in the process of tweaking this, and noticing that every once > in a while I get an 'odd' result like this: > > ------------------snippet-------------------- > SpamAssassin report: > This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached > along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted > mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > Content preview: Daily Update A community of more than 100,173 > database professionals and growing! [...] > > Content analysis details: (3.50 points, 3.75 required) > ----------------------end----------------------- > > ...notice that the hit-points *don't* exceed the required - and yet > it's rejected. > > Any ideas? > > - steve > > ========================================================= > http://www.commarc.co.nz > > (This e-mail has been scanned by MailMarshal) ========================================================= http://www.commarc.co.nz (This e-mail has been scanned by MailMarshal)
