This is interesting. I guess that by our current membership rules Michael just joined the group, so his input to how we feel about group sponsorship is as valid as ours.
It's Michelle, not Michael.
sigh. It strikes me that we might get
more offers of things like this as time goes on as well.
Perhaps we should have more structure to the group? A committee perhaps?
We do have a (rather silent) committee.
I have asked (on behalf of the committee, on behalf of CLUG) what exactly Michelle means in terms of the sponsership/"education" tradeoff.
Cheers, Carl.
