Because it makes performance issues rather obvious to the eye. If something doesn't go smoothly on 16 mhz, then it's inefficient.
That means when using faster computers, under higher load, performance will continue to be optimal... Ben. On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:58:58PM +1300, Paul William wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 18:31, Ben Aitchison wrote: > > it won't underclock to 16 mhz, will it? i want a 16 mhz 386 :) > > Why would you want a 16 mhz? > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:42:10AM +1300, Luuk Paulussen wrote: > > > ok, only the 386 left now (although somehow I don't think I'm going to have > > > a lot of luck) All it needs is a monitor... (I just remembered I have it's > > > original keyboard as well) > > > > -- > > .''`. Paul William > : :' : Debian admin and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
