yeah but the conversation started on rpm command line, so why change that. maybe it doesn't have X?
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:40:43 +1300 "Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Swat and samba are both on the RedHat installation cd's. > > Surely the easiest way is to install them using the RH package management > GUI. > > Regards, Robert > > What Do Fish Say When They Hit a Concrete Wall? > Dam! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Searle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 30 January 2004 10:20 a.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: installing swat > > Nick Rout wrote: > > >try getting swat version to match your samba version. > > > >you said samba was version 2.2.7a-7.9.0.i386.rpm, you are installing a > >later version 2.2.8a-1.i386.rpm. get the version that matches your > >redhat distro is the easiest way. > > > oh... ok, i've downloading the 2.2.7-1.i686 file. will have to wait > till later to try it - i have to stay in that other os for the next 9 > hours or so. > > > > >where did you download swat from? > > > > > a google search for swat, ended up at rpmfind.net. > > > > > > >On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:47:56 +1300 > >Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hi, hope someone can suggest what I need to do to resolve this output > >>after my attempt to install swat: > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux resources]# rpm -i swat-2.2.8a-1.i386.rpm > >>warning: swat-2.2.8a-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID f9651d5a > >>error: Failed dependencies: > >> rc-inetd >= 0.8.2 is needed by swat-2.2.8a-1 > >> inetdaemon is needed by swat-2.2.8a-1 > >> libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1 is needed by swat-2.2.8a-1 > >> libssl.so.0.9.6.1 is needed by swat-2.2.8a-1 > >> cups-lib is needed by swat-2.2.8a-1 > >> > >>i'm running redhat 9 and have "everything" installed. welcome to rpm > >>hell, roger . . . > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- Nick Rout Barrister & Solicitor Christchurch, NZ Ph +64 3 3798966 Fax + 64 3 3798853 http://www.rout.co.nz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
