Not that I have time for *(&@*(#@ SCO, but hey, but only a quick glance from me (read I may be wrong).
> obviously there were some problems for the groklaw guy over translation. > i'd be interested to hear from Volker, or anyone else with german skills. THere's a minor inconsistency in the computerwoche.de's 1st and 2nd paragraph: the 1st says SCO GmbH will desist from their claims towards Univention only, the 2nd says towards customers and users. The 2nd is probably accurate. The 4 points on groklaw are consistent with the Computerwoche report. I like 4) - suckers who bought SCO or Caldera instead of something better... (actually I think that clause is only there so SCO can protect their own products - not unreasonable). Why buyers of SCO's own products still have to fear prosecution from SCO is beyond me though. Perhaps the COmputerwoche report itself is dud. The penalty of 10000EUR is pathetic IMHO. Because the settlement is between SCO and Univention only, in case of infringement only Univention can claim the penalty. (my comment) Btw, groklaw doesn't manage to cut&paste some German text from Computerwoche onto their website. Disregard the German text on groklaw. Computerwoche also reports that SCO GmbH is forbidden to say that they'll come up with evidence "soon", unless that evidence is presented within one month. > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040301025634926 Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
