On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 17:04, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > Neither your ubiquitous *86* machines nor, to my knowledge, any other computer > chipset found in the current crop of personal machines is able to produce a > hardware segfault on array bound errors or, stack protection errors, i.e. > underflow, overflow or execution of code on the stack.
Actually, the 386+ *does* have the ability to do this. http://www.midpec.com/djgpp/protmode/index1_2.html Whether you want the compiler to generate segments for each of your data structures is another matter. Rex
