On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:56, you wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:47:09PM +1300, Zane Gilmore wrote:
> > Actually SMB is not a Microsoft networking protocol but it was first
> > developed by Digital. Of course M$ has made it it's own to a certain
> > extent but if you want to connect a Linux box to a VMS box SMB is the
> > way to go.  (VMS is/was a Digital operating system the software that
> > runs this list runs on it)
>
> Do you have any references for this?  Are you sure it's the same SMB?
> The somewhat incomplete history of CIFS[0] doesn't mention Digital or
> VMS at all.
>
> [0] http://samba.org/cifs/docs/smb-history.html

It wouldn't surprise me at all. I've read somewhere that many of the NT team 
at Microsoft came from the VMS team at Digital.

I'm too lazy to google a source right now.

Yuri

Reply via email to