Hi, > > -glade only integrates into a couple of languages. > C, C++, Ada, Eiffel, Python, Perl, Pike, and Ruby :P yes, the list has grown since I looked at it last. My recollection was 4 elements. I tried the C++ and it said - you have to load the module............
However, having looked at kdevelop on fedora core 2 test 1, I can assure you kdevelop has as long (if not longer) list. ==== > Yea, they changed the ".glade" file format, so you had to run a > conversion program. Pity it did not run automatically. Even bigger pity that the downloaded conversion program did not run on my box. Maybe I screwed up, but the thought was: getting the conversion program to work has to be easier than a project rewrite. So yes, I tried real hard to get the conversion program to work. ======== Yes, I like the packer in Glade. The packer in QT designer is a bit more effort to manage - but both systems give you the ability to create a window that will dynamically resize ok. So, if they are deprecating the code output from Glade, what is it to be replaced with ? =================================== Stability of code - who is at fault? The application writer, or the gui library? I have written some C++ apps with QtDesigner, and all are stable. I do remember something about a thread issue. The app must be careful to ensure only the gui thread writes to the display. Other threads must not write to the display. ============================================= Derek. ================================================================ On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Michael JasonSmith wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 08:40, Derek Smithies wrote: > > Then I upgraded to a new version of Glade. > Yea, they changed the ".glade" file format, so you had to run a > conversion program. Pity it did not run automatically. > > > -I had trouble with the autoconf things like you describe. The warnings > > don't seem to be fatal, so I am ignoring them. In about a wee while, > > the messages will be death. > Autoconf? Try using libglade to load the ".glade" file directly, rather > than getting Glade to generate the code. That way you can even write > proof-of-concept code in one language (Python?) and then switch to > another for the production code (Eiffel?). > > Thinking about it, I am surprised they have not deprecated the > code-generation from Glade. > > > -glade only integrates into a couple of languages. > C, C++, Ada, Eiffel, Python, Perl, Pike, and Ruby :P > > I like Glade, and GTK+. I like how the packer (layout manager) works, > and how the GUI is separated from the code. However, I can see how that > would not be to everyones taste ;) > > -- Derek Smithies Ph.D. This PC runs pine on linux for email IndraNet Technologies Ltd. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine ph +64 3 365 6485 Please do not notify me when (apparently) receiving a Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ windows virus from me......
