On Saturday 19 June 2004 13:53, Matthew Gregan wrote: > At 2004-06-19T114943+1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > Our standards conformant mail user agents will do as they are bidden > > Your complaint about Robert's Reply-To: field has nothing to do with > standards. Oh? <quote RFC-2882 para 3.6.2. Originator fields> . . The originator fields also provide the information required when replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es) to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the reply. . . </quote>
-- Sincerely etc. Christopher Sawtell NB. This PC runs Linux. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine. Please do not notify me when this occurs. Thanks.
