Although, the guy who made the post has only made one post on the forum, so I wouldn't put to much faith in him. I would expect the score to be much higher...
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:17:38 +0000, Caleb Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:19, Luuk Paulussen wrote: > > This link shows somebody getting similar speeds (same card) with a > > reply that the result is fine. > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=ad13ddb1c8153c306463d62b76 > >a97665&p=339920#post339920 > > That means I was totaly ripped off with this card :'( > > > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:37:52 +0000, Caleb Sawtell > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:59, Luuk Paulussen wrote: > > > > I have a radeon 9600pro - should be similar speed and I get > > > > approximately 4300 FPS... If you have anti-aliasing etc turned on in > > > > the drivers, it might be slowing it down. > > > > > > nope no AA > > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:05:21 +0000, Caleb Sawtell > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:46, Robert Fisher wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:22, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > > > > > > > Very good and very quick...for those with an nVidia card I would > > > > > > > suggest its invaluable for them to fine-tune their card for the > > > > > > > best use... > > > > > > > > > > on the subject of nvidia has anyone here got a geforce fx 5600xt > > > > > cause I only get 6114 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1222.800 FPS in glx > > > > > gears and I want to know if its my cheap chip set or a deeper prob... > > > > > > > > > > > Just installed it and I too am impressed. >
