On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:47, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > Yeah, the manpages suck. > > The ones of the late 5.5.x are a lot(!) better, the 6.x ones are > rumoured to have been rearranged and the options tidied up. If it works > it would be a big plus. > > > I've found a few good sites if anyone wants the > > links. > > Yes please!
http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/graphics/ http://www.csb.yale.edu/userguides/image/im/www/mogrify.html http://www.imagemagick.org/www/utilities.html > > But the code itself seems OK > > Ehhhm, mostly. I use montage a lot for making photo index pages. With > the current lot you can't change the font size, because if you do, the > text is always 3 times as wide as the whole page, let alone one photo. > It's this kind of thing I'm talking about. Reliability that something > which used to work still works at the next version is 2 out of 10. If > it works, the quality is certainly good. Ah, right. I foudn that the montage is very sensitive to original image size, so I have to resize the images to all the same size before amalgamating the composite image. I've used it to do a video effect that shows a matrix of different video clips, looking a bit like a bank of TV screens. Here's a site with great font resources: http://go.to/todofuentes/ Vik :v) ---- Him my fat leathery arse to kiss I told. -- Angry Yoda
