It seems that the irqbalance package is a Good Thing to be running on any
SMP machine.

/proc/interrupts
           CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       
  0:  249191981  249020259  249200408    IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:        465        454        467    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:          0          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  5:      48084      49218      51130   IO-APIC-level  sym53c8xx
  8:          3          2          3    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 11:     182171     197078     195078   IO-APIC-level  TLAN
NMI:          0          0          0 
LOC:  845518954  845518947  845518952 
ERR:          0
MIS:          0



-----Original Message-----
From: C. Falconer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2004 1:05 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 processors - No!


I suspect you do need SMP on to make use of the two virtual CPUs.

Theres no specific kernel option for HT, but the SMP option is HT aware.
However it's a mixed blessing... Some things go faster, some go slower at
the moment.

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-htl/
This is a good intro to yes and no for SMP/HT


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2004 12:54 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2 processors - No!


idle question (as i don't have a HT'ing P4) - do you need to run SMP to get
it working properly?

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:49:28 +1200
"C. Falconer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Cos you're a lucky bastard with a HT capable CPU.  Search google for
> HyperThreading for more info.
> 
> I'm jealous :)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 1 October 2004 12:44 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 2 processors - No!
> 
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pni
> monitor ds_cpl cid
> 
> --
> Robert Fisher
> www.fisher.net.nz
> 
> 

-- 
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to