On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:31, Gareth Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:38:30 +1200, Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:20, Gareth Williams wrote:
> > > I am not suggesting that it is a faulty disk. I am interested to know
> > > if you can actually mount /dev/sda4, that is all. The errors above
> > > look like fatal errors to me - that is to say, they seem to strongly
> > > suggest that the mount command failed, resulting in a still un-mounted
> > > /dev/sda4. How, then, do you come to the state in which /dev/sda4 IS
> > > mounted? (which I presume you must, in order to use the partition).
> >
> > Sorry Gareth, I thought I was replying to the list earlier.
> >
> > Buggered if I know how it works after the error but it does.
>
> LOL. I thought I was too! I didn't realise this was "off-list" until just
> now. damn gmail. I wish I could un-set that "reply-to:" header. Sending
> this to the list now, to get it back on-list.
>
> Um, can I ask how you know it's working? Could you please do the
> following commands directly after boot and post the output:
>
> # df
> # mount /dev/sda4 /home/share
> # df
>
> I have my suspicions that it isn't mounting, and anything you write to
> "/home/share" is in fact being written inside that directory on the
> root filesystem.

Indeed.
btw you'll get more information about mounted filesystems using the mount
command without any arguments vis;-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ mount
/dev/hda3 on / type reiserfs (rw,noatime,notail)
none on /dev type devfs (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw)
none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
none on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw)
none on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
nfsd on /proc/fs/nfs type nfsd (rw)
berty:/usr/portage/distfiles/ on /usr/portage/distfiles type nfs
(rw,addr=192.168.2.10)
berty:/mnt/disk1 on /mnt/disk1 type nfs
(rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,addr=192.168.2.10)

Be sure to check that you have either got the kernel module for the
 filesystem loaded, or the driver compiled into the kernel?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ zcat /proc/config.gz | egrep -i 'reiser|ext3'
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR is not set

Hope that Helps

--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell

Reply via email to