Let me translate. Rik has been agitating for change within CLUG. That is his right, but I expect he should tell us what he wants. Therefore I asked him this afternoon on the committee list (which he was co-opted onto a while ago) what motions he wanted to have the meeting consider. I did this so I could post to this main list and inform the list members what was being proposed.
I guess this is his answer, which ultimately will mean that we spend longer on the night sorting out what it is he wants. Or we just ignore Rik, vote for a committee and move on to the main course, which is linux support and encouragement. If you want to read the relevant committee list archives go here: http://www.rout.co.nz/pipermail/clug-c/2004-October/thread.html On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 17:30, yuri wrote: > WTF? I thought Nick was the resident lawyer. > Please rephrase in laymans' terms. > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:16:30 +1300, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As the caller, on 23 September 2004 before the Sydenham public meeting > > of CLUG, of our first Annual General Meeting, to be organised through > > the supervision of Christopher Sawtell at CLUG's prospective new venue > > in St Albans, I hereby discharge my responsibility to call for notices > > of motion to the aforesaid AGM, to be held from 7.30pm on Wednesday 27 > > October 2004. > > > > Cordially yours, > > > > Rik Tindall > > > >
