On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:17, Rik Tindall wrote: > This was a short-sighted and destructive post, Yuri, in that it can be > read as an attempt to sway 'public' (CLUG on-List) opinion, and pre-empt > representative decision-making processes. Nonsense. All he has done is given us - Nick Rout and I - a proxy vote to exercise on his behalf.
> As such, mostly it is exhibits lack of the 'good sense' you claim to > identify with. You can do better than this. There you go again. > c u there > > Rik > > yuri wrote: > >I'm working til 7.30pm on AGM night, so I won't get to St Albans until > >maybe 7.45~7.50ish. > >In case I miss the vote, please let the record show that I am in > >favour of status quo. > >I also endorse anything that both Nick Rout and Chris Sawtell agree > >with each other on, since those two seem to have their heads screwed > >on right. > > > >If I make it in time for AGM, all good. > > > >I will be bringing an 8-port ethernet switch and a few patch leads to > >the party :-) > > > >Yuri > > [tell it to Gmail?] > > > _______________________________________________ > clug-c mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rout.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/clug-c -- Sincerely etc., Christopher Sawtell
