On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:18, dave G wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:16, Roger Searle wrote: > > no i haven't. now i have, thanks david. and hey - it's 2 pages! > > > > Not if you print it double-sided!
or 2-up, which is pretty easy in kprint
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:18, dave G wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:16, Roger Searle wrote: > > no i haven't. now i have, thanks david. and hey - it's 2 pages! > > > > Not if you print it double-sided!
or 2-up, which is pretty easy in kprint